Note: This was written for my Contemporary Global Cinema class last spring.
Wong Kar-wai “the Jimi Hendrix of cinema”s most well loved film is 2000’s In The Mood For Love. (Jones 2000) The only film released in this century to be voted into the top 25 of the Sight & Sound critic’s poll of the best movies ever made. (Sight & Sound 2012) This along with the fact that it’s his most well regarded movie is the reason why I chose to analyze this film out of the ten total features he’s credited with directing. The Criterion Collection stamp of approval didn’t hurt either: “This film has been a major stylistic influence on the past decade of cinema, and is a milestone in Wong’s redoubtable career.” (Criterion 2012)
I’m not sure this is a movie you can understand. Analyze
endlessly, yes. Understand? No. It’s a movie you feel. This may be because, “for Wong, emotion, and
not necessarily story, is the content; style exists to evoke it.” (The Playlist 2013) It will make you question not if
you are with the right person, but if you
are the right person, and if you’re not, what should you do to ensure you
become that person?
The film is set in 1960s Hong Kong and concerns
two next-door neighbors, Mr. Chow and Mrs. Chan, whose spouses begin an affair.
After a while our heroes figure out they’re being cheated on, and begin meeting
to commiserate together. They develop feelings for each other, but struggle
with the choice of whether to act on them or not. They eventually choose not to
pursue a relationship, which breaks their hearts, but keeps them morally
superior to their unfaithful spouses. However, once their platonic relationship
develops into love and becomes an open secret between them, Chow does ask her
to leave Hong Kong with him. She doesn’t accept his extra ticket, and Chow moves
away to Singapore alone. They never see each other again.
This is really a film about questions. The
original title was Secrets but was
changed at the urging of the Cannes Film Festival because it was such a generic
title. (Kaufman 2001) The title Secrets
brings to my mind the act of interrogation, either of self, or others, which
the narrative encourages us to think about, as our protagonists role play Mrs.
Chan confronting Mr. Chan about his affair. We wonder if Mr. Chow and Mrs. Chan
shared secrets with their respective spouses. Mrs. Chan, for instance, arranges
clandestine meetings for her boss, Mr. Ho with his mistress, even on his wife’s
birthday! She tells Mrs. Ho that he’s working late at the office. The one
exception being on Mr. Ho’s birthday, where Mrs. Chan explains to the mistress
that he will be having dinner with his wife. Does Mrs. Chan go home and tell
her husband these things? I think not. The great irony is that the same types
of lies Mrs. Chan is involved with are what her husband tells her in order to
cheat on her.
Some of the questions the film raises include,
should we stay faithful to unfaithful people? What constitutes an affair? Why
would people cheat? Why not leave first? How much, if any, of the blame do
those who are cheated on share? Is getting emotionally attached to someone of
the opposite sex being unfaithful? Is getting cheated on a sufficient reason to
cheat also?
The whole film can perhaps be summed up in a
line from Mr. Chow. Speaking with Mrs. Chan about his former dream of being a
martial arts serial writer (I presume this means Wuxia stories), he says, “I
couldn’t get started, so I gave up.” This encapsulates their entire future
relationship. The sad part is that even though they never officially began a
romantic relation, they did have the foundation in place for a great
relationship. That’s why I’m tempted to believe that what they were doing in
essence constituted an “affair” as well, even if it never became anything physical.
Another important line is uttered by Mr. Ho
to Mrs. Chan. He tells as he prepares to leave the office to see his mistress
that there’s “No need to stay if everything’s done.” We as the audience want
Mr. Chow and Mrs. Chan to get together, because we know that their marriages
are already over and done with. But they can’t seem to go through with it. As
Joshua Kline writes, “The two potential lovers cling near one another like
satellites, but they seem to understand that they may never be able to share
the same orbit.” (Kline 20013)
But if “everything’s done,” why stay? Divorce was
less common in the 60s, surely, but these are very cosmopolitan characters, who
it seems aren’t against divorce. Why can’t they be together and stay together?
The film leaves it up to us to answer. I want to remake this as a teen romance
with the couple’s parents standing in for the cheating spouses to explore these
questions.
Wong Kar-wai is known for his incredible
visual aesthetic and he further explores this in In The Mood For Love. According to Tony Rayns, Wong Kar-wai
actually acted as his own director of photography on this film, despite what
the credits say. This was Wong’s first film where he knew exactly what he
wanted and how to get it. This film was actually shot two times over a period
of fifteen months because Wong found better location for the many apartment
scenes after they had “finished” shooting principal photography the first time,
(Rayns 2012) which accounts for why Christopher Doyle and Mark Li Ping-bin are
credited as the film’s cinematographers, since they did shoot the movie even if
their actual work isn’t on the screen or in the finished product.
This film is rife with beautiful shots ready to be
swiped and repurposed for other films. The cinematography tells the story. All
these beautiful shots serve a purpose. The lush photography shows us an
aesthetically beautiful world even while our heroes’ lives are falling apart
around them. We see they’re in this beautiful world, but they can’t seem to
escape their misery to enjoy it. This is where the power of photography comes
to intertwine with the subject and subtext of the film. The film takes place in
a Shanghaiese community that no longer exists; a world vanished. Wong Kar-wai
grew up in such a community, and he and his art director, William Chang do
their best to recapture it here.
But we all know the past can’t be recaptured, no
matter how hard we try. The film seems to tell us through its cinematography that
we are already in paradise and what we must do is awake to that fact, and make
our lives match the gorgeous worlds we already inhabit. That’s one of the
ironies of nostalgia; things once taken for granted are now infused with magic
and mystery and yes, even love. To quote the American director Noah Baumbach on
the popular music of his youth, “When I was a kid, I would resist Top 40 music,
because I was that kind of kid. But now I hear whatever was on the radio when I
was a kid and it makes me want to cry, it’s beautiful.” (Arbeiter 2015) And to
finally drive the nail in, an intertitle taken from Liu Yi-chang’s short story Intersection that appears towards the
end of the film reads, “That era has passed. Nothing that belonged to it exists
anymore.”
We see this in every
frame of the film. Restaurants, taxis, wallpaper, hairstyles, fashion, they’ve all
gone the way of all the earth. This leads us to ask the question, why is
nostalgia such a powerful force? What is it we want back? And is there a way to
get it back? This is a heavy movie!
I think that what Wong
Kar-wai is getting at through showing us these images is that we can’t be sure
that we’re not living in a golden age right now---and that even applies to our
relationships. Mr. Chow and Mrs. Chan love each other, but they don’t take the
next step to establish a relationship. Mr. Chow does make a weak attempt to
persuade Mrs. Chan to go with him to Singapore, but she doesn’t leave with him.
Later, there is a scene
where Chow can’t find something in his room, and he asks the apartment manager
who’s been in his room. The manager denies anyone has been there, but we then
see shots of Mrs. Chan in his room looking at his things. She was there, but
without him. Later, Mr. Chow goes back to Hong Kong and stops by his old
building to visit his landlord, and give him a present. He learns that his
landlord moved sometime ago. He leaves the present with the new occupant. He
almost knocks on the door next door to say hello to Mrs. Chan’s old landlord,
but he hesitates, and then leaves. What he doesn’t know is that Mrs. Chan has
since bought her landlord’s apartment and lives there. If he had knocked, he
would have seen her again! He barely misses her!
This film is so, so sad.
But it speaks a truth about the past and the future and the present that is
unmistakably important to everyone who sees it: we can’t let our lives (with
their attendant golden ages) pass us by through indecision. Mrs. Chan loves Mr.
Chow but won’t leave her husband even though he’s already left her in his
heart. This parallels what a clerk at Chow’s wife’s work tells Chow when he
comes to pick her up after her shift: “She’s already gone.”
The film’s final scene
follows Chow in Cambodia at the Angkor Wat temple complex as he follows the
ancient custom of letting go of secrets by whispering them in to a hole and
then filling the hole in with mud. He uses grass and dirt, but we get the idea.
But does he get rid of the secrets, or just sacralize them?
This emotion of losing
time right in front of your eyes is expressed in some of the bizarre shots
selected. There are shots when our heroes are in a restaurant talking and
suddenly we cut to a shot where the camera starts on an empty booth and quickly
dollies screen left to catch Mrs. Chan and Mr. Chow sitting in a booth
together. It’s disorienting because it looks almost amateurish. But since we
know these aren’t amateurs, we have to consider what they are drawing our
attention to, and that is the subject of time itself. As Kent Jones writes, “His
films are made up of moments that seem to have been grabbed out of time, as
though he's almost always just missed it.” (Jones 2000)
Another technique the
filmmakers use is jittery slow motion. It makes us feel like we’re being led
inexorably toward something, like the gallows for execution. That’s exactly
what happens as the potential relationship of our protagonists is killed by
their indecision. We’re repeatedly shown this in the objects the camera lingers
on. Clocks, doorways, hotel room numbers, empty hallways, walls that separate
characters who want to be together, and ringing telephones all testify to the
fact that the characters are halting between two opinions. (1 Kings 18:21)
Mrs. Chan wears a
different close-fitting high neck cheongsam dress in each scene. Twenty-one
different dresses appear in the final cut of the film. (Foam of Days 2013) Mrs.
Chan’s high fashion looks reveal her beauty and seemingly flirty and fun loving
ways while cleverly hiding and distracting from her heartbreak. We’d never see
her on the street and think that her husband would cheat on her. The change of
dress further imprints the passage of time on the audience.
The final intertitle
reads “The past was something he could see but not touch. And everything he
sees is blurred and indistinct.” Much like a Greek tragedy, Wong Kar-wai’s
masterpiece acts as a cathartic experience for the audience. The characters
suffer so that we can learn from their mistakes. We’re privileged to witness
the sad fate of Mr. Chow and Mrs. Chan so that we don’t become people who hold
on to the beautiful past, when we thought our future was brighter and
possibilities seemed to abound, but instead make the hard choices that will
allow our happiness to bloom in our hearts, just like the flowers on Mrs.
Chan’s amazing dresses. In The Mood For Love is a heartbreaking, instructive,
tragic masterpiece that deserves every bit of its lofty reputation.
Bibliography
Interview: Noah Baumbach Talks 'While We're Young,'
Working With James Murphy, Ad-Rock, Wes Anderson & More by Michael
Arbeiter. Retrieved at http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/interview-noah-baumbach-talks-while-were-young-working-with-james-murphy-ad-rock-wes-anderson-more-20150325
Online Entry for In The Mood For Love (2000) – The Criterion Collection #147 http://www.criterion.com/films/198-in-the-mood-for-love
In The
Mood For Love: 21 Dresses by “Foam
of Days” retrieved at: https://foamofdays.wordpress.com/2013/06/02/in-the-mood-for-love-21-dresses/
Of Love And The City: Wong Kar-wai’s In The Mood For Love by Kent Jones. Retrieved
at: http://www.filmcomment.com/article/of-love-and-the-city-wong-kar-wais-in-the-mood-for-love
Decade: Wong Kar-wai on "In The Mood For
Love" by Anthony Kaufman. Retrieved at http://www.indiewire.com/article/decade_wong_kar-wai_on_in_the_mood_for_love
1,001 Movies You Must See Before You Die, In The
Mood For Love entry by Joshua Klein. General Editor Steven Jay Schneider,
Updated By Ian Haydn Smith
Retrospective: The Films of Wong Kar-wai by The
Playlist Staff retrieved at http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/retrospective-the-films-of-wong-kar-wai-20130819
On In The
Mood For Love. Interview with Tony Rayns on Special Feature found on the
2012 Criterion Collection Blu-ray reissue of Wong Kar-wai’s In The Mood For Love.
The 50 Greatest Films of All Time By Sight &
Sound Contributors and Ian Christie. retrieved at: http://www.bfi.org.uk/news/50-greatest-films-all-time
